FromtheaboveSchickele（andHeadyafterhim）"efficient"inputsubsidizationbythelandownerwassought.Usinga50percentrentalshare（r=0.5）,andusingthehorizontalaxisoffigure4tomeasurenonlandinputsingeneral,Schickeleconcludedthat"ifthelandlordwouldshareequallyinalltheinputcostsgoingintocropproductiontheintensitywouldbecarriedto[t2],thatis,tothesamedegreewhichcorrespondstomaximumefficiency."[19]Itseconomiccontentaside,whatcouldhavebeenmerelyageometric"accident"

（1-r）intomarginal（output）costcurves,butwiththecurvesarbitrarilydrawn.[20]Thus,onSchic-kele':"Thecostofvariablefactors（whereonefactorsuchaslandisfixed）mustbedividedbetweenthelandlordandthetenantintheproportionsthatholdforthedivisionoftheproduct[toattainefficiency]."[21]Letmeclarify.Returntofigure4,whereweuser=,r,is0.5（thatusedbySchickele）.,ifthelandownercontributesnonlandinputsfromt1tot2,hewouldthenbesharingexactlyhalfthenonlandinputcost-orsharingit"intheproportionsthatholdforthedivisionoftheproduct.",recall,is1—rofateverypoint,,butaparadoxicalresultoneobtainswithoutit:Givenanyrentalpercentage,andawageratejusthighenoughtoreducetenantinputtozero（accordingtothetax-equivalentanalysis）,thevalueoflandisstillpositive（sincethetotalproductisstillgreaterthanthetotalwage）.Woulditbesensibletosay,then,thatincertaincasesthevalueoflandtothetenantisposi-tivebutheisnotwillingtoofferanysharepaymentforitsuse?